Toggle menu

Parking Enforcement Policy

Statutory grounds to make representations

Although the following are the 6 Statutory Grounds to make representation, in accordance with a directive issued by the Local Government Ombudsman, full consideration will be given and account taken off all representations received, whether or not they are fall within the description of "Statutory Grounds". It is for this reason that a 7th Ground, encompassing any other information the motorist or owner/keeper would like the Council to consider, has been included.

Enforcement Policy Guidelines.

All cases are considered on their respective merits, the following is the background guidance.

S1 - The contravention did not occur

S1.1 where the motorist claims he/she was loading/unloading

May accept representationsMay reject representations

On a waiting prohibition or in a controlled bay:

If evidence is available or provided to show:

1.  Goods being delivered or collected were heavy, bulky, or numerous and it would be unreasonable to expect them to be carried from 'legal' parking place.

2.  Loading/unloading activity was adjacent to the premises concerned.

3.  Loading/unloading activity was timely (includes checking goods and paperwork, but not delayed by unrelated activity)

[Source - Traffic Orders, decided cases e.g. Jane Packer Flowers]

If in the course of business, including commercial delivery/collections, couriers, multi drop parcel carriers, removal services, etc.

on school zig zag markings; on bus stop clearways;

on Taxi ranks on Police bays

where loading is prohibited-;

in car parks: (except when depositing materials in recycling bins)

 

If a valid pay & display ticket was not purchased first

 

S1.2 where the motorist claims that a parking pay & display machine was faulty

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If service records confirm a fault or that the machine had been taken out of service at the time of the contravention.

If there is reasonable doubt because evidence not available to confirm that a machine was working at the time (test ticket) and there was not another ticket machine nearby which was operating correctly.

If there was another ticket machine nearby that was working correctly at the time.

If there is no record of the machine being faulty or taken out of service.

If there is reasonable doubt because evidence confirms that other visitors had been able to purchase tickets during the relevant period

 

S1.3 where motorist claims that the restriction is not clearly signed or marked

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If signs and/or markings are missing or Unclear.

If signs and markings are inconsistent with each other and/or Traffic Order or legislation

If site visit records or photographs establish that signs and/or markings are correct and consistent with each other and the Traffic Regulation Order.

 

 S1.4 where motorist was carrying out building works

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If evidence confirms that the motorist was simply loading/unloading (see policy S1.1,above)

If valid waiver to park at the location in question had been issued and was on display in the vehicle.

If works are of a statutory nature or are exempted from restrictions by a Traffic Order or legislation

If it can be proven that works were an emergency,

In all other circumstances

 

S1.5 where motorist claims that PCN was not served (i.e. PCN not found attached to vehicle or handed to driver) 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the Parking Attendant's pocket book and/or computer notes confirm that the vehicle drove away before a PCN could be served,

i.e. PCN not handed to the driver or fixed to the vehicle.

If the parking attendant's notes or photographs confirm that a PCN was correctly served, i.e. handed to the motorist or fixed to their vehicle

 

S1.6 where the motorist claims that their vehicle was not parked in the location at the time and on the date alleged on the PCN which was issued 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Following consideration of all available evidence:

If the motorist provides a copy of their vehicle excise license (tax disc), which was valid at the time of the contravention, and the serial number of which differs from the number noted by the parking attendant.

If the motorist does not provide a copy of their tax disc, after being given a further opportunity to submit such a copy

Or - If the serial number on the copy tax disc provided by a motorist is identical to the serial number noted by the parking

attendant.

Or - If there is no evidence or if the evidence presented does not support the claim or is inconclusive

 

S1.7 where motorist claims that a valid authorisation to park, had been issued 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If records show that the motorist holds a valid authorisation to park.

If the motorist cannot provide a copy of the valid authorisation to park or if there is no record of any issue of the authorisation

If the motorist did not park in accordance with the authorization

 

S1.8 where the motorist claims that a pay & display ticket was purchased and displayed 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist produces a Pay & Display parking ticket that was valid at the time the Penalty Charge Notice was issued and the Parking Attendant confirms that a face- down ticket or a ticket that was displayed but concealed in some other way was seen and it is the first contravention of this kind.

If the motorist is unable to produce a valid pay & display ticket

The Parking Attendant was unable to confirm that a face down ticket or a ticket that was displayed but concealed in some other way was seen

The motorist has made a similar representation before and had a previous PCN cancelled, after giving them the benefit of the doubt; or

The parking attendant noted that the motorist obtained their ticket from another motorist in the car park; or where digits have been entered on the face of the ticket and do not match those of the motorist's vehicle registration, subject to some latitude being allowed for errors.

 

S2 - The penalty exceeded the relevant amount

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the PCN and/or Notice to Owner showed the incorrect amount of penalty charge, i.e. the wrong penalty charge band

If the PCN or Notice to Owner showed the correct amount of penalty charge

S3 - The traffic order was invalid

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If the Traffic Regulation Order which prescribes the restrictions that the vehicle was parked in contravention of was either not constructed correctly, i.e. is ultra vires, or was not made correctly, i.e. not consulted on properly

if the Traffic Regulation Order which prescribes the restrictions that the vehicle was parked in contravention of was constructed and made correctly

If the motorist merely considers the restrictions to be unfair

 

S4 - The motorist was not the owner/keeper of the vehicle at the time of the contravention

S4.1 where the current registered keeper claims that the vehicle was disposed of before the contravention occurred

May accept representationsMay reject representations

if the current registered keeper is able to provide proof that the vehicle was disposed of before the contravention, i.e. a bill of sale, registration documents, insurance documents or a letter from the DVLA; and/or If the current registered keeper is able to provide the full name and address of the person to whom they disposed of the vehicle.

Action - send a new Notice to Owner to the person named by the current registered keeper

If the current registered keeper is unable to prove that they disposed of the vehicle before the contravention nor provide the name and address of the person to whom they disposed of the vehicle

If the person named by the current registered keeper as the person to whom they disposed of the vehicle, either does not exist, cannot be traced or is for some other reason not considered to be bona fide

 

S4.2 where the current registered keeper claims that the vehicle was purchased after the contravention occurred

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the current registered keeper is able to provide proof that the vehicle was purchased after the contravention, i.e. an invoice, registration documents, insurance documents or a letter from the DVLA; and/or

If the current registered keeper is able to provide the full name and address of the person from whom they purchased the vehicle

If the current registered keeper is unable to prove that they purchased the vehicle after the contravention nor provide the name and address of the person from whom they bought the vehicle

If the person named by the current registered keeper as the person to whom they disposed of the vehicle, either does not exist, cannot be traced or is for some other reason not considered to be bona fide

 

S4.3 where the current registered keeper claims that a contracted third party was responsible for the vehicle at the time of the contravention 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Only when a hire agreement exists (see policy S6, below)

In all other circumstances because the registered keeper is always liable, including where the vehicle was left in the care of a garage

 

S4.4 where the motorist claims that they never owned the vehicle 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the DVLA confirm that the motorist was not the registered keeper at the time of the contravention

If the DVLA confirms that the motorist was the registered keeper of the vehicle at the time of the contravention.

If the previous registered keeper provides proof that the motorist bought the vehicle before the contravention, or the subsequent registered keeper provides proof that the motorist sold the vehicle after the contravention

If the motorist is proven to have hired the vehicle for the day on which the contravention occurred and signed an agreement to take responsibility for PCNs incurred, subject to the time of hire (see policy S6, below)

S5 - The vehicle had been taken without owner's consent

S5.1 where the current registered keeper claims that the vehicle had been stolen

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If the registered keeper provides a valid police crime report reference number.

If the current registered keeper is unable to provide any proof of theft

If the police crime report reference number provided by the current registered keeper does not exist or it does not match the theft or date of the theft alleged

 

S5.2 where the current registered keeper claims that the vehicle was driven by a third party (i.e. a friend, relative or estranged partner)

May accept representationsMay reject representations
In no circumstance

In all circumstances because the registered keeper is always liable, save for when a hire agreement exists (see policy S6, below)

S6 The owner is a hire company and have supplied the name of the hirer

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the hire company are able to provide proof that the vehicle was hired at the time of the contravention, i.e. a signed agreement

If the hire company are able to provide the full name and address of the person to whom they hired the vehicle

Action - send a new Notice to Owner to the person named by the hire company

If the hire company are unable to prove that they hired out the vehicle on the date of the contravention nor provide the name and address of the person to whom they hired the vehicle

If the person named by the hire company as the person to whom they hired the vehicle, without proof, either does not exist, cannot be traced or denies responsibility for the contravention

If the vehicle was being used as a courtesy car without an agreement signed to accept responsibility for Penalty Charge Notices issued.

 

S7 - Any other information that the motorist / vehicle owner want the Council to take into consideration

The decision whether or not a Penalty Charge Notice should be cancelled, will only be taken following very careful consideration, taking into account all of the evidence available.

Mitigating circumstances 1-10

MC1 where the motorist claims to have become unwell while driving

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist provides proof of a medical condition, temporary or permanent, that is consistent with the conditions described. When the notes made by the Parking Attendant support the motorist's representations.

If the motorist cannot provide some proof of a medical condition, temporary or permanent, consistent with the conditions described.

Or - Where other evidence contradicts the motorist's claims

 

MC2 where the motorist claims to be a doctor, nurse, health visitor attending a patient

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist concerned possesses a Medical Dispensation badge (BMA, HEBS) that the Council concerned recognises and approves and/or is exempt under the relevant Order.

Or

If the motorist produces evidence that they were responding to an urgent medical call and there was no nearby legal parking place

If motorist was not attending a patient in urgent circumstances or if there were legal parking spaces nearby.

If motorist was parked outside their practice or other place of work for any reason other than to collect supplies for an urgent call If motorist was parked in an area which does not correspond with claims made in representations, i.e. far from patients property, say, in a car park

 

MC3 where the motorist stopped to use the toilet 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

On production of medical evidence confirming a relevant medical condition and in support of the circumstances described in a representation.

In all other circumstances

 

MC4 where the motorist stopped to collect (prescribed) medication from a chemist

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Only in the most grave, urgent and exceptional of circumstances and the use of a 'legal' parking place would have caused an unacceptable delay.

In any lesser circumstances

 

MC5 where the motorist was a patient visiting a doctor's surgery 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist can provide a letter from a doctor to confirm that the visit was very urgent and that they were unable to walk from the nearest legal parking space.

If the motorist was not the patient but only driving the vehicle carrying the patient

If the motorist was attending a pre- arranged, non-urgent appointment.

If the motorist could reasonably have been expected to parked legally elsewhere.

 

MC6 where the motorist claims to have been recently bereaved 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If no evidence exists to the contrary, taking into account the sensitivity of this issue on first occasion.

Only if there is a significant reason to doubt the sincerity of representations, i.e. the parking attendant's notes indicating that the motorist was going about a normal day, say, shopping or working, or the bereavement considered to be a long time ago

 

MC7 where the motorist was delayed in returning to their vehicle and parking time purchased had expired 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If supported by appropriate evidence, the motorist's representations claims that the delay in returning to the vehicle was caused by circumstances that were entirely

unforeseen, unavoidable and exceptional. If motorist's vehicle had broken down, subject to concurrence with policy MC25, below)

If the motorist was unable to drive, since parking the vehicle.

If the delay described by the motorist was entirely avoidable, i.e. queuing in a shop. If the motorist simply underestimated the time needed and could have reasonably

purchased more time, i.e. when conducting business, shopping or commuting.

If the motorist was unable to drive since parking due to excess alcohol in the body or had been detained and charged by the police.

 

MC8 where the motorist "fed" a meter or pay & display machine by buying subsequent time to park in the same place or returned to the same place within a specified and prohibited time period 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

If the motorist overstays initial period of time purchased or returns within a period of 'No return'

 

MC9 where the motorist left the vehicle parked without a valid ticket on display to obtain change

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist had not left the car park, or onstreet pay and display area, while obtaining change and a ticket was purchased.

If the parking attendant's notes indicate that the motorist returned to their vehicle, having completed their purpose for parking, while the PCN was being issued, i.e. carrying shopping, or had left vehicle in car park, or on-street pay and display area, while obtaining change

 

MC10 where the motorist claims to have been unaware of charges or restriction in the car park relating to vehicle's class or weight

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If reference to restrictions on tariff board(s) are incorrect or missing.

In all other circumstances

 

 

Mitigating circumstances 11-20

MC11 where the motorist claims to have been unaware of recent rise in tariff

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If statutory notices were not erected in accordance with procedural regulations. If revised tariff is not on tariff board(s)If statutory notices were erected in accordance with procedural regulations and tariff board(s) were correct

 

MC12 where the motorist had parked with one or more wheels outside of a marked bay in a car park

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Only in the most exceptional of circumstances that were outside the motorists control and are supported by incontrovertible evidence.

Otherwise - In no circumstances

When clear and incontrovertible supporting evidence (photographs/Sketch plan) is available

 

MC13 where the motorist is a Blue Badge holder/transporting a Blue Badge holder and they did not have their Blue Badge and/or clock on display or could not be read or had expired 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If it can be established that this is the motorist's first contravention of this type and they can provide evidence that they are, or

were transporting, a Blue badge holder.

If the motorist has previously had a PCN cancelled for the same contravention and has been warned to display a valid badge /time clock, correctly in the future.

If the motorist was parked on a waiting restriction beyond the 3 hour time limit permitted by the Blue Badge Scheme, or on another restriction for which the Blue Badge does not provide an exemption.

 

MC14 where the motorist claims to have been unaware of the existence of a controlled parking zone 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If it can be established that the signing and marking of the CPZ is at fault, see policy S1.3, above

In all other circumstances

 

MC15 where the motorist was displaying an expired authorisation to park, i.e. waiver, parking place suspension, season ticket, residents permit, business permit or visitors permit

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the renewal of the authorisation was delayed by the Council's administrative processes

If it can be established that other reasonably unforeseen circumstances delayed the renewal of an authorisation to park, e.g. sickness on the part of the applicant or a postal dispute/delays (supported by appropriate evidence) In the case of season tickets and resident's / business parking permits only, if the authorisation had expired by less than 14 days

In all other circumstances

In the event of more than one vehicle registration included on season ticket or permit, subsequent production of the season ticket will not necessarily cause automatic cancellation of the PCN as the season ticket may have been used on the other vehicle

 

MC16 where the motorist is parked in contravention of a waiting/parking prohibition whilst displaying a resident's visitor permit

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

On all occasions 

 

MC17 where the motorist is a new resident within a controlled parking zone and had parked in a residents bay without displaying a valid residents permit

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In exceptional circumstances

On nearly all occasions 

 

MC18 where the motorist had parked incorrectly in a controlled bay on-street

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If it can be established that the motorist was genuinely loading or unloading, subject to compliance with policy S1.1, above.

On all occasions 

 

MC19 where the motorist assumed that they were entitled to "a period of grace" before the PCN was issued 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

On all occasions 

 

MC20 where the motorist claims they were attending a funeral 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If no evidence exists to the contrary, taking into account the sensitivity of this issue.

Only if there is a significant reason to doubt the sincerity of the representations.

 

Mitigating circumstances 21-30

MC21 where the motorist claims that snow, foliage, fallen leaves or flooding covered the signs or markings

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If it can be established that such conditions prevailed and it is likely that signs and markings were obscured as claimed and there was no alternative indication of the restriction.If it can be established that such conditions did not cause lines and signs to be obscured as claimed.

If the parking attendant's notes photographic evidence etc. directly contradict the motorist's version of events.

If any reasonable alternative indication of the restriction was available to the motorist.

If the location of the contravention was unlikely to be subject to the natural conditions described by the motorist, i.e. it was under cover

 

MC22 where the motorist claims that their vehicle had broken down

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If the motorist is able to provide evidence of a breakdown, i.e. proof of vehicle recovery or a bill of sale for repair or parts.

If the motorist is unable to provide evidence of any kind that their vehicle had broken down

If the cause of the vehicle "breaking down" was due to negligence on the part of the motorist, i.e. the vehicle had not been properly maintained, had run out of petrol or water or a similar reason

If the parking attendant's notes contradict the motorist's version of events.

 

MC23 where the motorist claims that they were attending an emergency or another vehicle that had broken down

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If the motorist is able to provide reasonable proof of the emergency, i.e. a credible report of an accident or incident, or that they were attending to another vehicle that had broken down.

If the motorist is unable to provide evidence of any kind that they were attending an emergency or another vehicle which had broken down

If the parking attendant's notes contradict the motorist's version of events, i.e. the motorist was not seen attending an emergency or another vehicle which was broken down

 

MC24 where the motorist claims to have put money into the wrong ticket machine

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If it is agreed that the position of the ticket machine used by the motorist is likely to cause confusion

If the ticket machine used by the motorist is positioned in such a place that confusion is not likely.

If the motorist has had representations accepted for a similar contravention previously.

 

MC25 where the vehicle in question was on police, fire brigade or ambulance duties

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If a senior officer of the service concerned, supports the representations and there is no reason to doubt that the vehicle was engaged on operational activities.

In all other circumstances

 

MC26 where the motorist claims to have been collecting or depositing monies at a bank

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the procedure explained in the motorist's representations is consistent with the allowance for loading and unloading, see Policy S1.1, above or

If specific arrangements have been agreed

In all other circumstances

 

MC27 where the motorist claims to have been unaware of a temporary parking restriction or special event restriction

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the motorist claims that there was no indication of the restriction, and the parking attendant's notes/photographs do not confirm that appropriate signing was in place.

If the process followed to make the temporary order was defective in some way.

If the parking attendant's notes/ photographs confirm that the vehicle was parked in an area restricted by the Temporary Order or Notice, and that appropriate signing was in place and clearly visible.

 

MC28 where the registered keeper liable for payment of the PCN is expected to be absent for a long period of time, e.g. is living abroad or is in prison

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

On all occasions

 

MC29 where the registered keeper liable for payment of the PCN is said to have died

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Where the circumstances can be confirmed (by sensitive enquiry).

Only if there is a significant evidence to doubt the sincerity of the representations.

 

MC30 where the vehicle driven by the motorist is diplomatically registered

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In all circumstances. A Notice to Owner should never be sent to the keeper of a diplomatically registered vehicle

KCC should be informed of all penalty charges unrecovered from keepers of diplomatically registered vehicles. They will pass information concerning these debts on to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office [Source - Secretary of State's Traffic Management and Parking Guidance, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964 and Government Report on Review of Vienna Convention...]

In no circumstances

 

Mitigating circumstances 31-44

MC31 where the motorist received a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) from a police officer or traffic warden when parked in the same location

May accept representationsMay reject representations
To prevent 'double jeopardy', if confirmation provided by the police that proceedings for a criminal offence in connection with the same parking/waiting incident have been instituted.In all other circumstances

 

MC32 where a Council officer or Member parked in contravention and claims to have been on Council business 

May accept representationsMay reject representations
If the officer was carrying out emergency or other statutory work.If it can be established that the officer/ Member could have reasonably parked elsewhere.

 

MC33 where the motorist stopped to drop off someone

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If the circumstances are seen by the parking attendant

If, in exceptional circumstances and subject to observations times, the motorist had to escort a passenger (child, elderly or disabled person) to home, or school.

If motorist was parked/stopped on school keep clear markings, pedestrian crossing, bus stop clearway

 

MC34 where motorist was unaware of the Overnight Waiting Ban/Commercial Vehicle waiting restriction 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If motorist was instructed / authorised to park in contravention of the restriction by the police.

In all other circumstances

 

MC35 where motorist states they were in police custody when PCN issued 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If proof (from the Police) has been provided that the police had instructed the motorist to leave the vehicle.

If the time of arrest (proof required from the Police) provides confirmation that motorist was legally parked and was unable to move vehicle before the restriction started

If no proof provided

If vehicle could have been legally parked before arrest

 

MC36 where motorist states they were visiting a friend or relative in urgent circumstances 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If due to an emergency the parking contravention could not be avoided due to the exceptional nature of the incident.

If motorist has already received a PCN, which has been cancelled for the same reason

If the Parking Attendant's Pocket Book notes provides significant reason to doubt sincerity of representation

 

MC37 where motorist claims there was no legal place to park

May accept representationsMay reject representations

Only in the most exceptional of circumstances

In the absence of exceptional circumstances

 

MC38 where motorist claims they were parked on private property 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If land search maps confirm location is private property & not subject of the relevant Traffic Regulation Order.

If there is insufficient evidence to establish location of vehicle

In all other circumstances

 

MC39 where motorist was delayed in returning to their vehicle parked in a limited waiting parking place 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If supported by appropriate evidence, the motorist's representations claim that the delay in returning to the vehicle was caused by circumstances that were entirely unforeseen, unavoidable and exceptional.

If motorist's vehicle had broken down, (subject to concurrence with policy MC25, above).

If the motorist was unable to drive, since parking the vehicle.

If the delay described by the motorist was not exceptional, i.e. queuing in a shop.

If the motorist simply underestimated the time needed and could have reasonably purchased more time.

If the motorist was unable to drive since parking due to excess alcohol in the body or had been were detained by the police for any reason, unless subsequently released without charge or proven innocent

 

MC40 where motorist had parked while asking directions / opening gates to private property

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If evidence provided by the Parking Attendant does not contradict representations

In all other circumstances

 

MC41 where motorist stopped to answer mobile phone

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

On all occasions

 

MC42 where motorist states that the details on the PCN are incorrect, e.g. location

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If there is reason to doubt that the PCN was issued correctly, taking into account evidence provided by the parking attendant

If the Penalty Charge Notice was fully and correctly completed.

 

MC43 where motorist states they were unaware of enforcement on Bank/Public holidays 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

In no circumstances

On all occasions

 

MC44 where motorist states that restriction was marked after the vehicle had been parked 

May accept representationsMay reject representations

If records confirm that signing/lining/ placement of cones or suspension notices was likely to have taken place after the vehicle parked.

If there is evidence to show that markings were already in place at the time of parking.

Share this page

Facebook icon Twitter icon email icon

Print

print icon